4.0 Review

The role of urinary pteridines as disease biomarkers

Journal

PTERIDINES
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 1-21

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/pterid-2016-0013

Keywords

cancer biomarkers; neopterin; pteridines; 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin; urinary biomarkers

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1011744]
  2. Department of Chemistry and Center for Single Nanoparticle, Single Cell, and Single Molecule Monitoring at Missouri University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pteridines and their derivatives function as intermediates in the metabolism of several vitamins and cofactors, and their relevance to disease has inspired new efforts to study their roles as disease biomarkers. Recent analytical advances, such as the emergence of sensitive mass spectrometry techniques, new workflows for measuring pteridine derivatives in their native oxidation states and increased multiplexing capacities for the simultaneous determination of many pteridine derivatives, have enabled researchers to explore the roles of urinary -pteridines as disease biomarkers at much lower levels with greater accuracy than with previous technologies or methods. As a result, urinary pteridines are being increasingly studied as putative cancer biomarkers with promising results being reported from exploratory studies. In addition, the role of urinary neopterin as a universal biomarker for immune system activation is being investigated in new diseases where it is anticipated to become a useful supplementary marker in clinical diagnostic settings. In summary, this review provides an overview of recent developments in the clinical study of urinary pteridines as disease biomarkers, covers the most promising aspects of advanced analytical techniques being developed for the determination of urinary pteridines and discusses the major challenges associated with implementing pteridine biomarkers in clinical laboratory settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available