4.4 Article

High fatigue and its associations with health and work related factors among female medical personnel at 54 hospitals in Zhuhai, China

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 304-316

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1361038

Keywords

Fatigue; prevalence; SCL-90-R; influencing factor; SCL-90-R: Symptoms Checklist-90-Revised; CFS: Chalder Fatigue Scale; PF: Physical fatigue; MF: Mental fatigue; OR: Odds ratios; CI: Confidence intervals

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China [20124433110003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fatigue and determine factors associated with fatigue in female medical personnel. Based on a cross-sectional study, a total of 1608 female medical personnel at 54 hospitals in Zhuhai, China were recruited by a multistage stratified cluster sampling method. The Symptoms Checklist-90-Revised and Chalder Fatigue Scale were used to assess psychiatric symptoms and fatigue, respectively. Data regarding demographic, health, and work related variables were also collected. Multivariate logistic regression model was constructed to determine the influencing factors of fatigue. Approximately 83% of participants had experienced fatigue in the past week. The risk of fatigue was higher in aged 30-39years old than older or younger participants; Longer sleeping time predicted a lower prevalence of fatigue (OR=.35), while tense physician-patient relationship predicted a higher prevalence of fatigue (OR=1.77). Depression(OR=1.76) and anxiety (OR=1.96) were found related to fatigue. Additionally, fatigue was associated with marital status, occupation, health related factors (exercise, regular diet, and health status), and work related factors (hospital rank and turnover intention). These study findings might facilitate development and implementation of targeted interventions and preventive measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available