4.7 Article

Relationships between circadian measures, depression, and response to antidepressant treatment: A preliminary investigation

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages 262-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.010

Keywords

Depression; Melatonin; Circadian; Phase angle difference; Sleep; Antidepressant; Phase

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH077690]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL122461]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR00043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few studies have examined relationships between circadian rhythms and unipolar major depressive disorder. Further, no study to date has examined circadian markers as predictors of response to depression treatment. In the present study, we examined associations between circadian timing and its alignment with sleep and depression severity in 30 adults with major depressive disorder who completed a randomized controlled trial of two weeks of time in bed (TIB) restriction administered adjunctive to fluoxetine, with a focus on sex differences. Thirty adults with major depressive disorder received 8 weeks of fluoxetine 20-40 mgs and were randomized to 8 h TIB or 6 h TIB for the first 2 weeks. Participants in the 6 h TIB condition were further randomized to a delayed bedtime or advanced risetime group. Circadian measures included dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and the difference between DLMO and midsleep point (i.e., phase angle difference). Depression was assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. For females, a phase delay after 2 weeks of fluoxetine and the experimental TIB manipulation was associated with a poorer response to fluoxetine, and depression severity was negatively correlated with phase angle difference, whereas males showed a positive correlation between depression severity and phase angle difference.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available