4.7 Article

Evidence that communication impairment in schizophrenia is associated with generalized poor task performance

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 172-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.12.051

Keywords

Schizophrenia; Disorganized speech; Communication impairment; Cognitive control; Working memory; Processing speed

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

People with schizophrenia exhibit wide-ranging cognitive deficits, including slower processing speed and decreased cognitive control. Disorganized speech symptoms, such as communication impairment, have been associated with poor cognitive control task performance (e.g., goal maintenance and working memory). Whether communication impairment is associated with poorer performance on a broader range of non cognitive control measures is unclear. In the current study, people with schizophrenia (n=51) and non psychiatric controls (n=26) completed speech interviews allowing for reliable quantitative assessment of communication impairment. Participants also completed multiple goal maintenance and working memory tasks. In addition, we also examined (a) simple measures of processing speed involving highly automatic prepotent responses and (b) a non -cognitive control measure of general task performance. Schizophrenia communication impairment was significantly associated with poor performance in all cognitive domains, with the largest association found with processing speed (r(s)=-0.52). Further, communication impairment was also associated with the non -cognitive control measure of poor general task performance (r(s)=-0.43). In contrast, alogia, a negative speech symptom, and positive symptoms were less if at all related to cognitive task performance. Overall, this study suggests that communication impairment in schizophrenia may be associated with relatively generalized poor cognitive task performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available