4.7 Article

The critical treatment window of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: Secondary analysis of an observational study

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 250, Issue -, Pages 65-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.064

Keywords

Critical treatment window; Clozapine; Schizophrenia; Treatment-resistant; Delay

Categories

Funding

  1. Daiichi Sankyo
  2. Eisai
  3. Pfizer
  4. Otsuka
  5. Astellas
  6. MSD
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10188] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies have suggested that a delay in initiating clozapine is one of the predictors of outcomes in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, whether there is a critical treatment window of clozapine in TRS and the duration of that window remain unclear. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously published observational study using a retrospective chart review of 105 patients with TRS who were treated with clozapine. We included 90 patients who remained on clozapine for at least 3 months. The delay in initiating clozapine was an independent contributor to symptomatic improvement based on treatment with clozapine by multiple linear regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve: 0.78) confirmed 2.8 years was the best predictive cut-off value of delay in initiating clozapine for responses in patients treated with clozapine (sensitivity: 0.66, specificity: 0.84). In patients with a delay in initiating clozapine of 5.2.8 years and a delay in initiating clozapine of > 2.8 years, the response rates were 81.6% and 30.8% (risk ratio=2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.80, 3.63), respectively. Clinicians should reduce the delay in initiating clozapine to less than 3 years to improve symptomatic outcomes in TRS and to prevent clozapineresistant schizophrenia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available