4.6 Article

The Influence of Stellar Spin on Ignition of Thermonuclear Runaways

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 857, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabd32

Keywords

nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; stars: neutron; stars: rotation; X-rays: bursts

Funding

  1. Australian Academy of Science's Scientific Visits to Europe program
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0880369, FT0991598]
  3. European Union's Horizon Programme under AHEAD project [654215]
  4. German DLR [50 OR 1405, 50 OR 1711]
  5. NWO Top Grant, Module 1
  6. ERC Starting grant [639217 CSINEUTRONSTAR]
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Australian Research Council [FT0991598, DP0880369] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Runaway thermonuclear burning of a layer of accumulated fuel on the surface of a compact star provides a brief but intense display of stellar nuclear processes. For neutron stars accreting from a binary companion, these events manifest as thermonuclear (type-I) X-ray bursts, and recur on typical timescales of hours to days. We measured the burst rate as a function of accretion rate, from seven neutron stars with known spin rates, using a burst sample accumulated over several decades. At the highest accretion rates, the burst rate is lower for faster spinning stars. The observations imply that fast (>400 Hz) rotation encourages stabilization of nuclear burning, suggesting a dynamical dependence of nuclear ignition on the spin rate. This dependence is unexpected, because faster rotation entails less shear between the surrounding accretion disk and the star. Large-scale circulation in the fuel layer, leading to enhanced mixing of the burst ashes into the fuel layer, may explain this behavior; further numerical simulations are required to confirm this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available