4.7 Review

Association between Ambient Air Pollution and Diabetes Mellitus in Europe and North America: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages 381-389

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307823

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Federal Office for Forest, Environment and Landscape
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Federal Office of Public Health
  4. Federal Office of Roads and Transport
  5. cantonal government of Aargau
  6. cantonal government of Basel-Stadt
  7. cantonal government of Basel-Land
  8. cantonal government of Geneva
  9. cantonal government of Luzern
  10. cantonal government of Ticino
  11. cantonal government of Zurich
  12. Swiss Lung League
  13. Lung League of Basel-Stadt/Basel-Landschaft
  14. Lung League of Geneva
  15. Lung League of Ticino
  16. Lung League of Zurich
  17. Santesuisse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Air pollution is hypothesized to be a risk factor for diabetes. Epidemiological evidence is inconsistent and has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVES: We systematically reviewed epidemiological evidence on the association between air pollution and diabetes, and synthesized results of studies on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: We systematically searched electronic literature databases (last search, 29 April 2014) for studies reporting the association between air pollution (particle concentration or traffic exposure) and diabetes (type 1, type 2, or gestational). We systematically evaluated risk of bias and role of potential confounders in all studies. We synthesized reported associations with T2DM in meta-analyses using random-effects models and conducted various sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We included 13 studies (8 on T2DM, 2 on type 1, 3 on gestational diabetes), all conducted in Europe or North America. Five studies were longitudinal, 5 cross-sectional, 2 case-control, and 1 ecologic. Risk of bias, air pollution assessment, and confounder control varied across studies. Dose-response effects were not reported. Meta-analyses of 3 studies on PM2.5 (particulate matter <= 2.5 mu m in diameter) and 4 studies on NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) showed increased risk of T2DM by 8-10% per 10-mu g/m(3) increase in exposure [PM2.5: 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.18); NO2: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17)]. Associations were stronger in females. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence indicates a positive association of air pollution and T2DM risk, albeit there is high risk of bias. High-quality studies assessing dose-response effects are needed. Research should be expanded to developing countries where outdoor and indoor air pollution are high.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available