4.0 Review

Systematic Review: Characteristics and Preclinical Uses of Bladder Cancer Cell Lines

Journal

BLADDER CANCER
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 169-183

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/BLC-180167

Keywords

Bladder cancer; cell lines; catalogues; animal models; urothelial cell carcinoma; cross-contamination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bladder cancer (BC) cell lines are indispensable in basic and preclinical research. Currently, an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of available BC cell lines is not available. Objective: To provide an overview and resources on the origin, pathological and molecular characteristics of commonly used human, murine and canine BC cell lines. Methods: A PubMed search was performed for relevant articles published between 1980 and 2017 according to the following MeSH terms: cell line; cell line, tumor; urinary bladder neoplasms; carcinoma, transitional cell. The Cellosaurus databasewas searched, using the term bladder and/or urothelial carcinoma. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: We provide information on 157 human, murine and canine BC cell lines. 103 human BC cell lines have molecular data available, of which 69 have been profiled by at least one omic technology. We outline how these cell lines are currently being used for in vitro and in vivo experimental models. These results allow direct comparison of BC cell lines to patient samples, providing information needed to make informed decisions on the most genomically appropriate cell line to answer research questions. Furthermore, we show that cross-contamination remains an issue and describe guidelines for prevention. Conclusions: In the BC field, multiple human, murine and canine BC cell lines have been developed and many have become indispensable for in vitro and in vivo research. High-throughput-omic technologies have dramatically increased the amount of molecular data on these cell lines. We synthesized a comprehensive overview of these data as a resource for the BC scientific community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available