4.2 Article

Comparison of derivatization/ionization techniques for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis of oxylipins

Journal

PROSTAGLANDINS & OTHER LIPID MEDIATORS
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 8-15

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2017.02.003

Keywords

Lipidomics; Eicosanoids; Oxylipins; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Derivatization; AMPP

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SCHE-1801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of two derivatization and ionization techniques for the quantitative reversed phase liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of hydroxy fatty acids (OH-PUFA) in plasma was evaluated: One used AMPP (N-(4-aminomethylphenyl)pyridinium chloride) leading to a positive charged amid-derivate which can be detected by electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS. Second yielded penta fluorobenzyl bromide (PFB) ester derivates allowing detection in electron capture atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (ecAPCI)-MS. The sensitivity of detection of a comprehensive set of hydroxy fatty acids of n6- and n3-poly unsaturated fatty acids was investigated. On the SCIEX3200 MS the applied PFB derivatization led to poor limits of detection (LOD) of 10-100 nM (0.1-1 pmo1/0.03-0.3 ng on column). By contrast, AMPP derivatization led to a similar sensitivity compared to the standard ESI(-) of non derivatized analytes (LOD about 1 nM (10 fmol/3 pg on column)). For several analytes, including 9-HETE, 11-HETE and 17-HDHA the AMPP derivatization improved sensitivity enabling their detection in human plasma. However, precision was reduced by AMPP derivatization and variation in IS recovery indicated a strong matrix influence on the MS-signal. In sum, with the instrumentation used, neither of these derivatization methods improves in our hands the LC-MS based quantification of oxylipins. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available