Journal
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
Volume 49, Issue 2-3, Pages 153-171Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-018-0525-y
Keywords
Bangladesh; Bias-corrected meta-frontier; Conservation agriculture; Endogenous switching regression; Meta-technology ratio; Technical efficiency
Funding
- United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in Bangladesh
- USAID-Washington
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) - CSISA Phase II project
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) - CSISA Phase III project
- Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR)
- USAID
- BMGF
- ACIAR
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Conservation tillage (CT) options are among the most rapidly spreading land preparation and crop establishment techniques globally. In South Asia, CT has spread dramatically over the last decade, a result of strong policy support and increasing availability of appropriate machinery. Although many studies have analyzed the yield and profitability of CT systems, the technical efficiency impacts accrued by farmers utilizing CT have received considerably less attention. Employing a DEA framework, we isolated bias-corrected meta-frontier technical efficiencies and meta-technology ratios of three CT options adopted by wheat farmers in Bangladesh, including bed planting (BP), power tiller operated seeding (PTOS), and strip tillage (ST), compared to a control group of farmers practicing traditional tillage (TT). Endogenous switching regression was subsequently employed to overcome potential self-selection bias in the choice of CT, in order to robustly estimate efficiency factors. Among the tillage options studied, PTOS was the most technically efficient, with an average meta-technology ratio of 0.90, followed by BP (0.88), ST (0.83), and TT (0.67). The average predicted meta-frontier technical efficiency for the CT non-adopters under a counterfactual scenario (0.80) was significantly greater (P = 0.00) than current TE scores (0.65), indicating the potential for sizeable profitability increases with CT adoption. Conversely, the counterfactual TE of non-adopters was 23% greater than their DEA efficiency, also indicating efficiency gains from CT adoption. Our results provide backing for agricultural development programs in South Asia that aim to increase smallholder farmers' income through the application of CT as a pathway towards poverty reduction.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available