4.7 Review

Brain-immune interactions in perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury

Journal

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 50-68

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.10.006

Keywords

Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia; Neonatal brain injury; Neuroinflammation; Innate immune response; Adaptive immune response; Inflammatory mediators; MicroRNAs; Immunomodulatory therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL083966, HL118861, NS103017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perinatal hypoxia-ischemia remains the primary cause of acute neonatal brain injury, leading to a high mortality rate and long-term neurological deficits, such as behavioral, social, attentional, cognitive and functional motor deficits. An ever-increasing body of evidence shows that the immune response to acute cerebral hypoxia-ischemia is a major contributor to the pathophysiology of neonatal brain injury. Hypoxia-ischemia provokes an intravascular inflammatory cascade that is further augmented by the activation of resident immune cells and the cerebral infiltration of peripheral immune cells response to cellular damages in the brain parenchyma. This prolonged and/or inappropriate neuroinflammation leads to secondary brain tissue injury. Yet, the long-term effects of immune activation, especially the adaptive immune response, on the hypoxic-ischemic brain still remain unclear. The focus of this review is to summarize recent advances in the understanding of post-hypoxic-ischemic neuroinflammation triggered by the innate and adaptive immune responses and to discuss how these mechanisms modulate the brain vulnerability to injury. A greater understanding of the reciprocal interactions between the hypoxic-ischemic brain and the immune system will open new avenues for potential immunomodulatory therapy in the treatment of neonatal brain injury. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available