Journal
POLITICS GROUPS AND IDENTITIES
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 264-280Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2016.1208105
Keywords
Gender; political behavior; political ambition; intersectionality; discrimination; stereotype threat
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Political institutions in the U.S. continue to be dominated by men. Media and scholarly accounts often focus on how demand factors, such as political parties and elite networks, and supply factors, such as women's self-confidence and political interest, combine to depress women's representation. Yet, we know little about whether these narratives matter for women's political ambition or how they might influence women of color. We demonstrate that blaming women's underrepresentation on supply vs. demand causes clear changes in women's political ambition. Attributing women's lack of parity to demand factors allows white and Asian women to discount the possibility that failure rests on their own abilities, thus increasing women's political ambition. Alternatively, framing women's underrepresentation as due to supply factors depresses white and Asian women's political ambition possibly because of stereotype threat. Black women respond in an opposite manner, with depressed political ambition in demand scenarios, while Latinas are unaffected by these narratives. Our findings contribute to understanding how frames intersect with racial and ethnic identity to influence political ambition.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available