4.7 Article

Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks

Journal

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 678-686

Publisher

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.040

Keywords

Urban buried gas pipeline; Failure probability; Fault tree; Bayesian network; Multi-state variables; Uncertain causal relationships; Sensitivity analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51304259, 51254001]
  2. open project of security early warning and emergency response technology for Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center [JD20150206]
  3. project of Chongqing Social Livelihood Science and Technology Innovation [CSTC2016shmszx00002]
  4. project of Chongqing Basic Science and Frontier Technology Research [CSTC2017jcyjBX0011]
  5. Oklahoma State University (USA)
  6. Canada Research Chair (Tier I) program (Canada)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Failures of urban buried gas pipelines have caused significant fire and explosion accidents with tremendous losses. This work presents an advanced two-step approach to analyze failure probabilities of the urban buried gas pipeline. First, a logical failure model is developed with the operational, material and environmental parameters contributing to the failure (Fault Tree Analysis). Second, the logical model is transformed into a network model (Bayesian Network). This novel approach can better reveal the relationships among failure causal factors and can also update the failure probabilities as operational and environmental conditions evolve. The Bayesian network failure model is subsequently applied to a case study. The results indicate that this approach is feasible and reasonable which can assist in identifying safety critical factors. Improving reliability of these safety critical factors can be of great help in enhancing the safety of urban buried gas pipelines. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available