4.2 Article

Examining a Statewide Educational Consulting Program for Pediatric Brain Injury

Journal

CLINICAL PEDIATRICS
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 645-655

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0009922817732146

Keywords

traumatic brain injury; concussion; education; postacute care; pediatric

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [K08HD073241]
  2. Pennsylvania Department of Health through federal Title V Maternal & Child Family Health Block Grant Funding
  3. Bureau of Special Education via the Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes characteristics of students with acquired brain injury enrolled in a statewide educational consultation program and the program's support activities. Utilizing deidentified data from a statewide brain injury school consultation program, descriptive analyses of demographic and injury characteristics, including medical diagnosis (concussion/mild traumatic brain injury [TBI], moderate-severe TBI, and non-TBI), referral characteristics, educational placement, and the types of program activities were undertaken. 70% of students were referred for concussions/mild TBI and students were infrequently referred by medical professionals. Most students with concussion/mild TBI experienced recreational injuries (59%), while students with moderate/severe TBI commonly experienced road traffic injuries (48%). The greatest proportion of program team members' time was spent in consultation with school personnel (24%), communication with families (20%), and communication with school personnel (16%). Results suggest that the program addresses important communication and coordination needs among families, medical professionals, and educators and identifies opportunities to enhance program utilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available