4.8 Article

Conformational equilibria of light-activated rhodopsin in nanodiscs

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1620405114

Keywords

rhodopsin; GPCR; conformational heterogeneity; nanodiscs; double electron-electron resonance

Funding

  1. NIH [R01EY05216, GM R35118145]
  2. Canada Excellence Research Chair program
  3. Anne and Max Tanenbaum Chair in Neuroscience
  4. Jules Stein Professor Endowment
  5. National Eye Institute [P30EY00331]
  6. European Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conformational equilibria of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are intimately involved in intracellular signaling. Here conformational substates of the GPCR rhodopsin are investigated in micelles of dodecyl maltoside (DDM) and in phospholipid nanodiscs by monitoring the spatial positions of transmembrane helices 6 and 7 at the cytoplasmic surface using site-directed spin labeling and double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy. The photoactivated receptor in DDM is dominated by one conformation with weak pH dependence. In nanodiscs, however, an ensemble of pH-dependent conformational substates is observed, even at pH 6.0 where the MIIbH(+) form defined by proton uptake and optical spectroscopic methods is reported to be the sole species present in native disk membranes. In nanodiscs, the ensemble of substates in the photoactivated receptor spontaneously decays to that characteristic of the inactive state with a lifetime of similar to 16 min at 20 degrees C. Importantly, transducin binding to the activated receptor selects a subset of the ensemble in which multiple substates are apparently retained. The results indicate that in a native-like lipid environment rhodopsin activation is not analogous to a simple binary switch between two defined conformations, but the activated receptor is in equilibrium between multiple conformers that in principle could recognize different binding partners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available