4.6 Review

Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00051

Keywords

mendelian randomization; causal inference; GWAS; bias; statistical methods

Funding

  1. Community Medicine Research net of the University of Greifswald, Germany - Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, 01ZZ0403]
  2. Ministry of Cultural Affairs
  3. Social Ministry of the Federal State of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania
  4. DFG (German Research Foundation) [393148499]
  5. University of Greifswald

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a framework for assessing causal inference using cross-sectional data in combination with genetic information. This paper summarizes statistical methods commonly applied and strait forward to use for conducting MR analyses including those taking advantage of the rich dataset of SNP-trait associations that were revealed in the last decade through large-scale genome-wide association studies. Using these data, powerful MR studies are possible. However, the causal estimate may be biased in case the assumptions of MR are violated. The source and the type of this bias are described while providing a summary of the mathematical formulas that should help estimating the magnitude and direction of the potential bias depending on the specific research setting. Finally, methods for relaxing the assumptions and for conducting sensitivity analyses are discussed. Future researches in the field of MR include the assessment of non-linear causal effects, and automatic detection of invalid instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available