4.7 Article

A Bayesian ensemble data assimilation to constrain model parameters and land-use carbon emissions

Journal

BIOGEOSCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages 2909-2930

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-15-2909-2018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200020_172476]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200020_172476] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM) is applied in a probabilistic framework and benchmarking system to constrain uncertain model parameters by observations and to quantify carbon emissions from land-use and land-cover change (LULCC). Processes featured in DGVMs include parameters which are prone to substantial uncertainty. To cope with these uncertainties Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) is used to create a 1000-member perturbed parameter ensemble, which is then evaluated with a diverse set of global and spatiotemporally resolved observational constraints. We discuss the performance of the constrained ensemble and use it to formulate a new best-guess version of the model (LPX-Bern v1.4). The observationally constrained ensemble is used to investigate historical emissions due to LULCC (E-LUC) and their sensitivity to model parametrization. We find a global E-LUC estimate of 158 (108, 211) PgC (median and 90% confidence interval) between 1800 and 2016. We compare E-LUC to other estimates both globally and regionally. Spatial patterns are investigated and estimates of E-LUC of the 10 countries with the largest contribution to the flux over the historical period are reported. We consider model versions with and without additional land-use processes (shifting cultivation and wood harvest) and find that the difference in global E-LUC is on the same order of magnitude as parameter-induced uncertainty and in some cases could potentially even be offset with appropriate parameter choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available