4.8 Article

Microbial community assembly and evolution in subseafloor sediment

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614190114

Keywords

marine sediment; bacteria; metagenomics; evolution; single-cell genomics

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF104]
  2. FP7 European Research Council (ERC) [294200]
  3. ERC Starting Grant PUZZLE_ CELL
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research Grant [SSF-FFL5]
  5. Carlsberg Foundation
  6. Julie-von-Moellen Foundation
  7. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial and archaeal communities inhabiting the subsurface seabed live under strong energy limitation and have growth rates that are orders of magnitude slower than laboratory-grown cultures. It is not understood how subsurface microbial communities are assembled and whether populations undergo adaptive evolution or accumulate mutations as a result of impaired DNA repair under such energy-limited conditions. Here we use amplicon sequencing to explore changes of microbial communities during burial and isolation from the surface to the >5,000-y-old subsurface of marine sediment and identify a small core set of mostly uncultured bacteria and archaea that is present throughout the sediment column. These persisting populations constitute a small fraction of the entire community at the surface but become predominant in the subsurface. We followed patterns of genome diversity with depth in four dominant lineages of the persisting populations by mapping metagenomic sequence reads onto single-cell genomes. Nucleotide sequence diversity was uniformly low and did not change with age and depth of the sediment. Likewise, there was no detectable change inmutation rates and efficacy of selection. Our results indicate that subsurface microbial communities predominantly assemble by selective survival of taxa able to persist under extreme energy limitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available