4.7 Article

Impact of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages 1340-1348

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.005

Keywords

Randomized controlled trial; Brain aging; Social activity; Cognitive activity; Physical activity; Neuroimaging; Cortical volume; Hippocampus; MRI

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins Neurobehavioral Research Unit
  2. National Institute on Aging (BSR grant) [P01 AG027735-03]
  3. Johns Hopkins Epidemiology and Biostatistics of Aging Research Fellowship [NIA T32AG000247]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: There is a substantial interest in identifying interventions that can protect and buffer older adults from atrophy in the cortex and particularly, the hippocampus, a region important to memory. We report the 2-year effects of a randomized controlled trial of an intergenerational social health promotion program on older men's and women's brain volumes. Methods: The Brain Health Study simultaneously enrolled, evaluated, and randomized 111 men and women (58 interventions; 53 controls) within the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial to evaluate the intervention impact on biomarkers of brain health at baseline and annual follow-ups during the 2-year trial exposure. Results: Intention-to-treat analyses on cortical and hippocampal volumes for full and sex-stratified samples revealed program-specific increases in volumes that reached significance in men only (P's <= .04). Although men in the control arm exhibited age-related declines for 2 years, men in the Experience Corps arm showed a 0.7% to 1.6% increase in brain volumes. Women also exhibited modest intervention-specific gains of 0.3% to 0.54% by the second year of exposure that contrasted with declines of about 1% among women in the control group. Discussion: These findings showed that purposeful activity embedded within a social health promotion program halted and, in men, reversed declines in brain volume in regions vulnerable to dementia. (C) 2015 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available