4.7 Article

Diagnostic value of lobar microbleeds in individuals without intracerebral hemorrhage

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 1480-1488

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.04.009

Keywords

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Microbleed; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Boston criteria; Sensitivity; Specificity; Predictive value; Likelihood ratio

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01NS070834, R01 NS17950]
  2. National Institute on Aging-Massachusetts General Hospital [5P50AG005134-30]
  3. Framingham Heart Study's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-25195]
  4. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG16495, AG08122, AG033193, AG031287, K23AG038444, P30AG13846]
  5. NIH [1RO1 HL64753, R01 HL076784, 1 R01 AG028321]
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs -Framingham Heart Study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The Boston criteria are the basis for a noninvasive diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in the setting of lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We assessed the accuracy of these criteria in individuals with lobar microbleeds (MBs) without ICH. Methods: We identified individuals aged. 55 years having brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological assessment of CAA in a single academic hospital and a community-based population (Framingham Heart Study [FHS]). We determined the positive predictive value (PPV) of the Boston criteria for CAA in both cohorts, using lobar MBs as the only hemorrhagic lesion to fulfill the criteria. Results: We included 102 individuals: 55 from the hospital-based cohort and 47 from FHS (mean age at MRI 74.7 +/- 8.5 and 83.4 +/- 10.9 years; CAA prevalence 60% and 46.8%; cases with any lobar MB 49% and 21.3%; and cases with >= 2 strictly lobar MBs 29.1% and 8.5%, respectively). PPV of probable CAA (>= 2 strictly lobar MBs) was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60.4-97.8) and 25% (95% CI, 13.2-78) in hospital and general populations, respectively. Discussion: Strictly lobar MBs strongly predict CAA in non-ICH individuals when found in a hospital context. However, their diagnostic accuracy in the general population appears limited. (C) 2015 The Alzheimer's Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available