4.8 Article

Evidence that the rate of strong selective sweeps increases with population size in the great apes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605660114

Keywords

selective sweep; population size; great ape; adaptive evolutionary rate; mutation limitation

Funding

  1. European Commission-funded 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development NEXTGENE Project
  2. Danish Research Council for Independent Research [1323-00076A]
  3. European Molecular Biology Organization
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2014-55090-P]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [BFU2015-7116]
  6. Fundacio Zoo Barcelona
  7. [BFU2015-6215-ERC]
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying the number of selective sweeps and their combined effects on genomic diversity in humans and other great apes is notoriously difficult. Here we address the question using a comparative approach to contrast diversity patterns according to the distance from genes in all great ape taxa. The extent of diversity reduction near genes compared with the rest of intergenic sequences is greater in a species with larger effective population size. Also, the maximum distance from genes at which the diversity reduction is observed is larger in species with large effective population size. In Sumatran orangutans, the overall genomic diversity is similar to 30% smaller than diversity levels far from genes, whereas this reduction is only 9% in humans. We show by simulation that selection against deleterious mutations in the form of background selection is not expected to cause these differences in diversity among species. Instead, selective sweeps caused by positive selection can reduce diversity level more severely in a large population if there is a higher number of selective sweeps per unit time. We discuss what can cause such a correlation, including the possibility that more frequent sweeps in larger populations are due to a shorter waiting time for the right mutations to arise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available