4.8 Article

Mutagenic cost of ribonucleotides in bacterial DNA

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710995114

Keywords

ribonucleotide excision repair; DNA polymerase; mutagenesis; RNase Hll

Funding

  1. NIH National Research Service Award [T32 GM007544]
  2. NIH [R01 GM107312]
  3. Rackham Graduate School, University of Michigan
  4. NIH Cellular Biotechnology Training Grant [T32 GM008353]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replicative DNA polymerases misincorporate ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs) into DNA approximately once every 2,000 base pairs synthesized. Ribonucleotide excision repair (RER) removes ribonucleoside monophosphates (rNMPs) from genomic DNA, replacing the error with the appropriate deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP). Ribonucleotides represent a major threat to genome integrity with the potential to cause strand breaks. Furthermore, it has been shown in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis that loss of RER increases spontaneous mutagenesis. Despite the high rNTP error rate and the effect on genome integrity, the mechanism underlying mutagenesis in RER-deficient bacterial cells remains un known. We performed mutation accumulation lines and genome wide mutational profiling of B. subtilis lacking RNase Hll, the enzyme that incises at single rNMP residues initiating RER. We show that loss of RER in B. subtilis causes strand- and sequence-context- dependent GC -> AT transitions. Using purified proteins, we show that the replicative polymerase DnaE is mutagenic within the sequence context identified in RER-deficient cells. We also found that DnaE does not perform strand displacement synthesis. Given the use of nucleotide excision repair (NER) as a backup pathway for RER in RNase Hll-deficient cells and the known mutagenic profile of DnaE, we propose that misincorporated ribonucleotides are removed by NER followed by error-prone resynthesis with DnaE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available