Journal
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 591-626Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0020818318000139
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Norwegian Research Council under the project Evaluating Power Political Repertoires (EPOS) [250419]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Why do leading actors invest in costly projects that they expect will not yield appreciable military or economic benefits? We identify a causal process in which concerns about legitimacy produce attempts to secure dominance in arenas of high symbolic value by investing wealth and labor into unproductive (in direct military and economic terms) goods and performances. We provide evidence for our claims through a comparative study of the American Project Apollo and the Ming Dynasty's treasure fleets. We locate our argument within a broader constructivist and practice-theoretic understanding of hierarchy and hegemony. We build on claims that world politics is a sphere of complex social stratification by viewing constituent hierarchies in terms of social fields. Our specific theory and broader framework, we contend, provide tools for understanding the workings of power politics beyond military and economic competition.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available