4.8 Article

Perceiving social interactions in the posterior superior temporal sulcus

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1714471114

Keywords

social perception; social interaction; superior temporal sulcus; fMRI; social brain

Funding

  1. US/UK Office of Naval Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative Research Initiative Project (Understanding Scenes and Events Through Joint Parsing, Cognitive Reasoning, and Lifelong Learning)
  2. National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines [CCF-1231216]
  3. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primates are highly attuned not just to social characteristics of individual agents, but also to social interactions between multiple agents. Here we report a neural correlate of the representation of social interactions in the human brain. Specifically, we observe a strong univariate response in the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) to stimuli depicting social interactions between two agents, compared with (i) pairs of agents not interacting with each other, (ii) physical interactions between inanimate objects, and (iii) individual animate agents pursuing goals and interacting with inanimate objects. We further show that this region contains information about the nature of the social interaction-specifically, whether one agent is helping or hindering the other. This sensitivity to social interactions is strongest in a specific subregion of the pSTS but extends to a lesser extent into nearby regions previously implicated in theory of mind and dynamic face perception. This sensitivity to the presence and nature of social interactions is not easily explainable in terms of low-level visual features, attention, or the animacy, actions, or goals of individual agents. This region may underlie our ability to understand the structure of our social world and navigate within it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available