4.7 Review

A review on thermally conductive polymeric composites: classification, measurement, model and equations, mechanism and fabrication methods

Journal

ADVANCED COMPOSITES AND HYBRID MATERIALS
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 207-230

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42114-018-0031-8

Keywords

Thermally conductive polymeric composites; Measurement methods; Model and equations; Mechanism

Funding

  1. Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773169, 51403175]
  2. Open Fund from State Key Laboratory of Solid Lubrication of Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics [LSL-1715]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3102017jg02003]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NPU [SKLSP201713]
  5. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [55570-DNI10]
  6. NSF [CBET-1603264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the fast-developing miniaturization and integration of microelectronics packaging materials, ultrahigh-voltage electrical devices, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and in areas which require good heat dissipation and low thermal expansion, the investigations on the polymeric composites with highly thermal conductivities and excellent thermal stabilities are urgently required, which would be beneficial to transferring the heat to the outside of the products, finally to effectively avoid substantial overheating and prolong their working life. Our article reviews recent progress in the classification, measurement methods, model and equations, mechanisms, commonly used thermally conductive fillers, and the correlative fabrication methods for the thermally conductive polymeric composites, aiming to understand and grasp how to enhance the lambda value effectively. And future perspectives, focusing scientific problems and technical difficulties of the present thermally conductive polymeric composites are also described and evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available