4.7 Article

Resilience of Energy Infrastructure and Services: Modeling, Data Analytics, and Metrics

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages 1354-1366

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2698262

Keywords

Data analytics; failure; nonstationary spatiotemporal models; power distribution infrastructure; recovery; resilience metrics; services to customers

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1435778, ECCS-1549881]
  2. New York State Energy Research Development Authority
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1435778] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1549881] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large-scale power failures induced by severe weather have become frequent and damaging in recent years, causing millions of people to be without electricity service for days. Although the power industry has been battling weather-induced failures for years, it is largely unknown how resilient the energy infrastructure and services really are to severe weather disruptions. What fundamental issues govern the resilience? Can advanced approaches such as modeling and data analytics help industry to go beyond empirical methods? This paper discusses the research to date and open issues related to these questions. The focus is on identifying fundamental challenges and advanced approaches for quantifying resilience. In particular, the first aspect of this problem is how to model large-scale failures, recoveries, and impacts, involving the infrastructure, service providers, customers, and weather. The second aspect is how to identify generic vulnerability in the infrastructure and services through large-scale data analytics. The third aspect is to understand what resilience metrics are needed and how to develop them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available