4.5 Article

New Megasphaera-like microfossils reveal their reproductive strategies

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 300, Issue -, Pages 141-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2017.08.006

Keywords

Ediacaran microfossil; Megasphaera affinity; Reproductive strategy

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB835002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41621003]
  3. 111 project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New occurrence of Ediacaran Weng'an Biota-type microfossil assemblage has been discovered from the base of the Dengying Formation in Zhenba County, Shaanxi Province, South China. The assemblage is dominated by spherical microfossils ranging from 200 to 1200 mu m in diameters. Based on the size and morphological features, two genera and three species have been identified, i.e. Megasphaera inornata, M. ornata and Spiralicellula bulbifera. Morphological analyses reveal three types of reproduction, i.e. binary fission, budding, and multiple fission, which are widely distributed among protist and metazoan lineages. Besides, a physiological phenomenon of ornament growth has been discovered among M. ornata. These again raise difficulties in determining biological affinities of Megasphaera-like microfossils. The new microfossil assemblage shares the most common elements of embryo-like microfossils with the Weng'an biota. However, those Large Acanthomorphic Acritarchs (LAAs) with great capacity for biostratigraphic correlation are not present. The age of the new assemblage is constrained within the Ediacaran, contemporary with or slightly younger than the Weng'an Biota by regional correlation. The new finding not only extends the geographical distribution of the Ediacaran phosphatized biotas in South China, but also provides valuable fossil materials for studying ontogenesis and evolution of early microscopic organisms and taphonomy of phosphatized soft-bodied fossil Lagerstatte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available