4.7 Article

Characteristics of particle breakage of sand in triaxial shear

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages 656-667

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.08.001

Keywords

Grain size distribution; Particle breakage; Plastic work; Sand; Triaxial tests

Funding

  1. CAS Light of West China Program [Y6R2250250]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-DQC010]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB733201]
  4. One Hundred Talents Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. China Scholarship Council [2011671035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A great deal of triaxial tests were conducted under various influence factors on the Silica sand No.5 with the purpose of investigating the characteristics of particle breakage. Particle breakage was measured by sieve analysis conducted at the different axial strain level after the tests to obtain relevant grain size distribution curves which were quantified by relative breakage. It was found that the particle breakage in relative breakage increases with increasing axial strain and confining pressure. Particle breakage was also caused during consolidation. Denser sample was revealed to cause more particle breakage. Initial stress anisotropy was found to result in more particle breakage during anisotropic consolidation than that during isotropic consolidation but during shearing the higher confining pressure resulted in more particle breakage than the initial stress anisotropy with a relatively lower confining pressure. Particle breakage was found to increase in up convexity with increasing cycle number of cyclic loading but in up concavity with increasing additional axial strain. A hyperbolic model was proposed to correlate the particle breakage in relative breakage with the plastic work per unit volume for the monotonic and cyclic triaxial tests. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available