4.7 Article

Impacts of earthworms on nitrogen acquisition from leaf litter by arbuscular mycorrhizal ash and ectomycorrhizal beech trees

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.06.013

Keywords

Mycorrhizal community; Earthworms; Nutrient cycling; Stable isotopes; Leaf litter

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony
  2. 'Niedersachsisches Vorab' as part of the Cluster of Excellence 'Functional Biodiversity Research'
  3. German Science Foundation (DFG) [PE 2256/1-1]
  4. People Republic of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earthworms (EWs) and mycorrhizal fungi are key components of soil biota participating in N recycling from leaf litter. The extent to which their interactions impact leaf litter-derived N uptake by tree species colonized by different mycorrhizal types and the variation of these interactions with leaf litter quality is unknown. We used a greenhouse experiment to investigate the effects of EWs on plant acquisition of N from N-15 enriched ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) leaf litter. We employed arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) ash and ectomycorrhizal (EM) beech trees. EW presence did not affect the overall root mycorrhizal colonization, but in the beech leaf litter treatment it caused a shift in the EM fungal community, favoring species with a ruderal life strategy at the expense of more specialized species able to degrade organic compounds. No differences in N-15 capture were found between EM and AM plants. Generally, 2-7% of the N released from leaf litter was taken up by the plants. EWs uniformly increased plant acquisition of N from leaf litter. This effect was more pronounced in treatments with ash than in those with beech leaf litter, presumably because of higher degradability of ash than of beech litter. The results suggest that leaf litter quality dominates the impact of EWs on plant N acquisition from leaf litter while the mycorrhizal type is of minor importance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available