4.1 Article

The Sentinel™ EADR program can detect more microorganisms than bedding sentinel animals

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 125-129

Publisher

HOKKAIDO UNIV
DOI: 10.14943/jjvr.66.2.125

Keywords

exhaust air dust (EAD); monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bedding sentinel programs have been the standard method for monitoring the health status of rodents housed in individually ventilated cages. However, it has been reported that some infectious microorganisms cannot be detected by bedding sentinels. Thus, more sensitive microbiological monitoring methods are needed. In the present study, we assessed the sensitivity of the Sentinel (TM) EAD(R) program, developed by Allentown Inc. and Charles River Laboratories Inc., which involves a combination of exhaust air dust and environmental PCR testing. We compared the sensitivity of Sentinel (TM) EAD(R) to that of bedding sentinels and fecal samples collected from mice housed in rooms. In conclusion, Sentinel (TM) EAD(R) was more sensitive than the bedding sentinel method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available