3.8 Article

The new AMS facility at Tianjin University

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41605-018-0064-0

Keywords

XCAMS; C-14; Be-10; Al-26

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China (NSFC) [11775157, 11575296]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) has been used for the analysis of a lot nuclides in many scientific fields and is one of the most optimal methods to determine very low concentrations of long-lived nuclides. The XCAMS system is an extension of the Compact Accelerator Mass Spectrometer for and . A description of the first Chinese XCAMS system and initial performance of three nuclides of , , and , respectively, will be reported. Solid sample material (graphite, , and ) is loaded into cathode holders for AMS analysis. The negatively charged ions () are extracted and accelerated to the terminal, broken-up, and some orbital electrons stripped off to form positively charged atomic ions, and accelerated further. In the post-acceleration region, the magnetic and electrostatic devices act on momentum and energy analysis, respectively. A multi-anode detector is used for the identification and detection of relevant isotopes and isobars. The test criteria of three rare isotopes each were set for beam current intensity, measurement precision, and machine background. The corresponding material and cathode holder were, respectively, used for , , and test. Several batches of real sample have already been analyzed by the new AMS system based on the acceptance test results. In addition, several secondary standards were measured to check the stability of the system. The new XCAMS facility has been installed successfully, and the latest performance also showed that the machine is reliable enough, in general. Both the hardware components and software system were in good condition for accurate and precise data analysis in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available