4.7 Article

Experimental and modeling analysis of mechanical-electrical behaviors of polypropylene composites filled with graphite and MWCNT fillers

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 467-474

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.009

Keywords

Tensile strength; Flexural strength; Electrical conductivity; Carbon fillers; Multi-walled carbon nanotube; Prediction models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incorporation of carbon fillers can improve the thermal and electrical conductivities of polymer composites but will also have a significant effect on the flexural and tensile behavior. In this paper, two types of carbon fillers were added to polypropylene - carbon nanotubes and synthetic graphite. The influences of these filler materials on the tensile, flexural and fracture toughness characteristics were measured and the electrical conductivity of composites was also investigated. It was observed that the fillers lead to a remarkable increase in the flexural and tensile modulus of polypropylene composites. The maximum flexural and tensile strengths slightly increased with the addition of graphite, however, they were significantly increased in the case of carbon nanotubes because MWCNTs possess exceptional stiffness and strength and their length to diameter ratio is extremely high when compared with graphite. Electrical conductivity of polypropylene composites was evaluated. Noteworthy, composites based on synthetic graphite show a percolation process at one order of magnitude concentration higher than MWCNT filled polypropylene. Fracture toughness results open a wide range of applications for PP-MWCNT composites. Several prediction models were inspected in this research and it was concluded that inverse rule of mixtures model showed the most accurate predictions of the tensile modulus for composites made of polypropylene. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available