4.7 Article

Analysis and Design of Load-Independent Output Current or Output Voltage of a Three-Coil Wireless Power Transfer System

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2018.2808698

Keywords

Constant current (CC); constant voltage (CV); load-independent; three-coil wireless power transfer (WPT) system

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1201002]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [PolyU 252040/17E]
  3. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-ZE7J]
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51525702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design of operating frequencies and compensation topologies for load-independent output current or output voltage in two-coil wireless power transfer (WPT) system has been widely studied. The three-coil WPT system has been proven to be more efficient and shows a better performance compared to the two-coil WPT system with an increasing transmission distance. However, the research on load-independent output voltage or output current of the three-coil WPT system is still at pilot stage. This paper systematically investigates the loadin-dependent output voltage and output current characteristics of a three-coil WPT system to achieve a constant output voltage (CV) and constant output current (CC) with near zero reactive power, which can simplify the control. The CV and CC characteristics are achieved by well-designed passive parameters of the receiver side compensation. Additionally, a hybrid receiver side compensation with two additional switches for the three-coil WPT system is developed to charge the electric vehicle battery by combining the CC and CV characteristics. Finally, a scaled-down experimental setup with 4-A charging current and 96-V cell voltage is constructed to verify the proposed approach. The experimental results agree well with the theoretical analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available