4.4 Article

Making Advantaged Racial Groups Care About Inequality: Intergroup Contact as a Route to Psychological Investment

Journal

CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 194-199

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0963721417743282

Keywords

intergroup contact; race; inequality; empathy; disadvantage; dehumanization; inclusion

Funding

  1. Russell Sage Foundation Visiting Scholar Fellowship
  2. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Racial inequality remains an objective reality in the United States and around the world, yet members of advantaged racial groups often deny or minimize its existence. Although we have well-developed theories to explain why advantaged racial groups would be motivated to deny or minimize inequality, at present we know relatively little about why Whites and other advantaged racial groups might be willing to acknowledge or care about racial inequality. In this article, we propose that contact between racial groups offers one of the most promising pathways to advance these outcomes. We review established and emerging research literature suggesting that contact contributes to these outcomes by encouraging members of advantaged racial groups to become psychologically invested in the perspectives, experiences, and welfare of members of disadvantaged racial groups. We propose that psychological processes such as building empathy, enhancing personal relevance, and humanizing other people can facilitate the extent to which contact leads to greater psychological investment in other racial groups. We conclude by discussing several factors that may serve as obstacles to psychological investment across racial lines and the relevance of contact and establishing connections between racial groups in light of current social divisions and racial tensions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available