4.7 Article

SiO2-TiO2-PBC nanocomposite film morphology, solvent swelling, estimated χ parameter, and liquid transport

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 123, Issue -, Pages 247-257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.029

Keywords

Sol-gel chemistry and inorganic-organic; nanocomposites; Ionomers; Swelling and liquid transport

Funding

  1. NSF [CMMI-1562822]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), titanium isopropoxide (TIP), and poly [t-butylstyrene -b- ethylene -alt-propylene -b- sulfonated styrene -b- ethylene -alt- propylene -b- t-butylstyrene] or Pentablock Copolymer (PBC) were used to create a series of nanocomposite inorganic-organic materials. Sol-gel chemistry provided a route to maximize the interactions between an inorganic network and organic polymer chains. The inorganic materials presence affected film morphology, swelling behavior, and liquid transport properties. PBC morphology was disrupted by TIP, which is attributed to enhanced interactions between inorganic and organic domains. This caused micro-phase separation that was observed as a morphology change from ordered to random. These dynamic interfacial interactions perturbed the chain's packing efficiency, which caused a decrease in the estimated polymer density within nanocomposites from 1.036 g/mL to 0.879 g/mL. Inorganic concentration within PBC caused a significant increase in alcohol uptake from around 200 wt% to more than 300 wt%, and a decrease in THF uptake from around 400 wt% to 20 wt%. Nanocomposite film swelling was modeled using the Flory-Rehner Equation. Modeling predicted that increasing inorganic content shifted the material to a more polar system. This led to a decrease in chi with alcohols and water, and an increase in chi with THF. Alcohol and fructose transport through an inorganic-organic film increased four times without sacrificing selectivity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available