4.5 Article

Diabetic retinopathy screening using deep neural network

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 412-416

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13056

Keywords

artificial intelligence; computer; diabetic retinopathy; neural network; screening

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ImportanceThere is a burgeoning interest in the use of deep neural network in diabetic retinal screening. BackgroundTo determine whether a deep neural network could satisfactorily detect diabetic retinopathy that requires referral to an ophthalmologist from a local diabetic retinal screening programme and an international database. DesignRetrospective audit. ParticipantsDiabetic retinal photos from Otago database photographed during October 2016 (485 photos), and 1200 photos from Messidor international database. MethodsReceiver operating characteristic curve to illustrate the ability of a deep neural network to identify referable diabetic retinopathy (moderate or worse diabetic retinopathy or exudates within one disc diameter of the fovea). Main Outcome MeasuresArea under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity. ResultsFor detecting referable diabetic retinopathy, the deep neural network had an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.901 (95% confidence interval 0.807-0.995), with 84.6% sensitivity and 79.7% specificity for Otago and 0.980 (95% confidence interval 0.973-0.986), with 96.0% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity for Messidor. Conclusions and RelevanceThis study has shown that a deep neural network can detect referable diabetic retinopathy with sensitivities and specificities close to or better than 80% from both an international and a domestic (New Zealand) database. We believe that deep neural networks can be integrated into community screening once they can successfully detect both diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available