3.9 Article

Locomotion of a flexible one-hinge swimmer in Stokes regime

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2399-6528/aaa856

Keywords

hydrodynamic interaction; sperm number; viscosity

Funding

  1. DST

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EM Purcell showed that a body has to perform non-reciprocal motion in order to propel itself in a highly viscous environment. The swimmer with one degree of freedom is bound to do reciprocal motion, whereby the center of mass of the swimmer will not be able to propel itself due to the Scallop theorem. In the present study, we are proposing a new artificial swimmer called the one-hinge swimmer. Here we will show that flexibility plays a crucial role in the breakdown of Scallop theorem in the case of one-hinge swimmer or two-dimensional scallop at low Reynolds number. To model a one-hinge artificial swimmer, we use bead spring model for two arms joined by a hinge with bending potential for the arms in order to make them semi-flexible. The fluid is simulated using a particle based mesoscopic simulation method called the multi-particle collision dynamics with Anderson thermostat. Here, we show that when our swimmer has rigid arms, the center of mass of the swimmer is not able to propel itself as expected from the Scallop theorem. When we introduce flexibility in the arms, the time reversal symmetry breaks in the case of the one-hinged swimmer without the presence of a head contrary to the one-armed super paramagnetic swimmer which required a passive head in order to swim. The reduced velocity of the swimmer is studied using a range of parameters like flexibility, beating frequency and the amplitude of the beat, where we obtain similar scaling as that of the one-armed swimmer. We also calculate the dimensionless Sperm number for the swimmer and we get the maximum velocity when the Sperm number is around similar to 1.8

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available