4.6 Article

Mercury in the Arctic tundra snowpack: temporal and spatial concentration patterns and trace gas exchanges

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1939-1956

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-1939-2018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [PLR 1304305]
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA EPSCoR NNX14AN24A]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [1304202] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1739567] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the Arctic, the snowpack forms the major interface between atmospheric and terrestrial cycling of mercury (Hg), a global pollutant. We investigated Hg dynamics in an interior Arctic tundra snowpack in northern Alaska during two winter seasons. Using a snow tower system to monitor Hg trace gas exchange, we observed consistent concentration declines of gaseous elemental Hg (Hg-gas(0)) from the atmosphere to the snowpack to soils. The snowpack itself was unlikely a direct sink for atmospheric Hg-gas(0). In addition, there was no evidence of photochemical reduction of Hg-II to Hg-gas(0) in the tundra snowpack, with the exception of short periods during late winter in the uppermost snow layer. The patterns in this interior Arctic snowpack thus differ substantially from observations in Arctic coastal and temperate snowpacks. We consistently measured low concentrations of both total and dissolved Hg in snowpack throughout the two seasons. Chemical tracers showed that Hg was mainly associated with local mineral dust and regional marine sea spray inputs. Mass balance calculations show that the snowpack represents a small reservoir of Hg, resulting in low inputs during snowmelt. Taken together, the results from this study suggest that interior Arctic snowpacks are negligible sources of Hg to the Arctic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available