3.8 Proceedings Paper

Substrate Induced Effect on Structural and Optical Properties of Aluminum Nanoparticles

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 13739-13744

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.013

Keywords

Aluminum nanoparticles; Silicon substrate; ITO substrate; AFM; UV-spectrophotometer; e-beam PVD

Funding

  1. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR)
  2. Kuwait government [P-KISR-06-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigate the effect of growing Aluminum nanoparticles (Al NPs) by Electron-Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (e-beam PVD) followed by thermal annealing on both Silicon (Si) and Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) substrates. Surface morphology and optical properties of the as-deposited and the thermally annealed aluminum thin-films were studied using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and UV-Spectrophotometer respectively. AFM topography images of annealed Aluminum films on Si-substrate clearly show a formation of Al nanoparticles with average diameter about 40 nm while this was different in the case of Aluminum films on ITO-substrate where non-uniform flakes-like Aluminum nanostructures were observed. Other structural parameters such as surface roughness, particles distributions, and size of Aluminum nanostructures were extracted and studied for both substrates. UV-Vis absorption spectrum for annealed Aluminum film on ITO has shown a shift of about 14 nm in the absorption peak around 388 nm wavelength compared to as-deposited film. Different nanostructures in both substrates resulted from the effect of surface energy of the used substrate. Further characterization techniques will be carried out for the Al nanoparticles to provide a deep understanding of the substrate role combined with optimized properties of NPs to assist improving the control over the formation of metallic nanoparticles. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available