4.3 Article

Resource conflict detection and removal strategy for nondeterministic emergency response processes using Petri nets

Journal

ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 729-750

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17517575.2014.986215

Keywords

emergency response process; resource conflict detection; resource preparation time; priority-activity-first strategy; Petri nets; conflict-free net

Funding

  1. National Natural Science foundation of China
  2. NSFC [61472229, 61170079, 61202152]
  3. Science & Technology Development Fund of Shandong Province [2014GGX101035, 2014BSB01020]
  4. Science & Technology Development Fund of Qingdao [13-1-4-153-jch, 2013-1-24]
  5. Taishan Scholar Climbing Program of Shandong Province of China
  6. Graduate Innovation Foundation Project of Shandong University of Science and Technology [YC140106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correctness of an emergency response process specification is critical to emergency mission success. Therefore, errors in the specification should be detected and corrected at build-time. In this paper, we propose a resource conflict detection approach and removal strategy for emergency response processes constrained by resources and time. In this kind of emergency response process, there are two timing functions representing the minimum and maximum execution time for each activity, respectively, and many activities require resources to be executed. Based on the RT_ERP_Net, the earliest time to start each activity and the ideal execution time of the process can be obtained. To detect and remove the resource conflicts in the process, the conflict detection algorithms and a priority-activity-first resolution strategy are given. In this way, real execution time for each activity is obtained and a conflict-free RT_ERP_Net is constructed by adding virtual activities. By experiments, it is proved that the resolution strategy proposed can shorten the execution time of the whole process to a great degree.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available