4.5 Review

Auditory System Target Engagement During Plasticity-Based Interventions in Schizophrenia: A Focus on Modulation of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate-Type Glutamate Receptor Function

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.02.002

Keywords

Biomarker; Cognition; MMN; NMDA; Plasticity; Schizophrenia; Treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health [UL1 RR024156]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 RR024156]
  3. Dr. Joseph E. and Lillian Pisetsky Young Investigator Award for Clinical Research in Serious Mental Illness
  4. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  5. National Institute of Mental Health
  6. Stanley Foundation
  7. Taisho
  8. Lundbeck
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. NeuroRX
  11. Merck
  12. Lilly
  13. [MH59803]
  14. [MH94320]
  15. [MH068725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive deficits are predictive of long-term social and occupational functional deficits in schizophrenia but are currently without gold-standard treatments. In particular, augmentation of auditory cortical neuroplasticity may represent a rate-limiting first step before addressing higher-order cognitive deficits. We review the rationale for N-methyl-o-aspartate-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR) modulators as treatments for auditory plasticity deficits in schizophrenia, along with potential serum and electroencephalographic target engagement biomarkers for NMDAR function. Several recently published NMDAR-modulating treatment studies are covered, involving D-serine, memantine, and transcranial direct current stimulation. While all three interventions appear to modulate auditory plasticity, direct agonists (D-serine) appear to have the largest and most consistent effects on plasticity, at least acutely. We hypothesize that there may be synergistic effects of combining procognitive NMDAR-modulating approaches with auditory cortical neuroplasticity cognitive training interventions. Future studies should assess biomarkers for target engagement and patient stratification, along with head-to-head studies comparing putative interventions and potential long-term versus acute effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available