4.7 Article

Testing and analysis of axially loaded normal-strength recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tubular stub columns

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages 192-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.007

Keywords

Concrete filled steel tubes; Recycled aggregate concrete; Substitution level; Scatter; Confinement effects; Stress-strain relationship

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China - China [51178146]
  2. 'Project 985'-Basic Scientific Research Capacity for Young Scholars of HIT
  3. School of Civil Engineering of Harbin Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thirty-nine stub columns were tested to failure to investigate the compressive behaviour of normal-strength recycled aggregate concrete filled steel tubular (RACFST) stub columns under axial loading. Study parameters included recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) substitution level, source of RCA, compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) core and ratio of steel area over concrete area. Experimental results showed that the scatter in the mechanical properties of RACFST stub columns is smaller than that in RACs due to the contribution of steel tubes. The source of RCA had little effect on the compressive behaviour of axially loaded RACFST stub columns within the parameter range adopted in the tested specimens. A reduction of less than 10% was measured in the compressive strength of RACFSTs due to the incorporation of RCA, which is smaller than that for RAC samples in material tests. As part of the work, confinement effects of the steel tubes to the RAC cores during the whole loading process were investigated based on the strain gauge measurements. Model equations were then proposed to predict the longitudinal stress-strain relationships for both steel tubes and RAC cores. Current CFST design provisions are compared with the RACFST stub columns test results, and the design recommendations are presented. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available