Journal
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-0991-1
Keywords
Breast cancer; ADC; DWI; Ki-67
Categories
Funding
- NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA151326] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Numerous studies have analyzed associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and histopathological features such as Ki-67 proliferation index in breast cancer (BC), with mixed results. The purpose of this study was to perform a multicenter analysis to determine relationships between ADC and expression of Ki-67 and tumor grade in BC. Methods: For this study, data from six centers were acquired. The sample comprises 870 patients (all female; mean age, 52.6 +/- 10.8 years). In every case, breast magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging was performed. The comparison of ADC values in groups was performed by Mann-Whitney U test where the p values are adjusted for multiple testing (Bonferroni correction). The association between ADC and Ki-67 values was calculated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, accuracy, and AUC were calculated for the diagnostic procedures. ADC thresholds were chosen to maximize the Youden index. Results: Overall, data of 870 patients were acquired for this study. The mean ADC value of the tumors was 0.98 +/- 0.22 x 10(3) mm(2) s(-1). ROC analysis showed that it is impossible to differentiate high/moderate grade tumors from grade 1 lesions using ADC values. Youden index identified a threshold ADC value of 1.03 with a sensitivity of 56.2% and specificity of 67.9%. The positive predictive value was 18.2%, and the negative predictive value was 92.4%. The level of the Ki-67 proliferation index was available for 845 patients. The mean value was 1233 +/- 21.77%. ADC correlated with weak statistical significant with expression of Ki-67 (p = - 0.202, p < 0.001). ROC analysis was performed to distinguish tumors with high proliferative potential from tumors with low expression of Ki-67 using ADC values. Youden index identified a threshold ADC value of 0.91 (sensitivity 64%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 67.7%, negative predictive value 45.0%). Conclusions: ADC cannot be used as a surrogate marker for proliferation activity and/or for tumor grade in breast cancer.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available