4.7 Article

Higgs boson pair production at future hadron colliders: From kinematics to dynamics

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 97, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.113004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-95ER40896]
  2. Pittsburgh Particle Physics Astrophysics and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC)
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [PHY-1519175, PHY-162063]
  4. JSPS [JP16H03991, JP16H02176, 17H05399]
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1519175] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H05399] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measurement of triple Higgs coupling is a key benchmark for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and future colliders. It directly probes the Higgs potential and its fundamental properties in connection to new physics beyond the Standard Model. There exist two phase space regions with an enhanced sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling, the Higgs pair production threshold, and an intermediate top pair threshold. We show how the invariant mass distribution of the Higgs pair offers a systematic way to extract the Higgs selfcoupling, focusing on the leading channel pp -> hh + X -> b (b) over bar gamma gamma + X. We utilize new features of the signal events at higher energies and estimate the potential of a high-energy upgrade of the LHC and a future hadron collider with realistic simulations. We find that the high-energy upgrade of the LHC to 27 TeV would reach a 5 sigma observation with an integrated luminosity of 2.5 ab(-1). It would have the potential to reach 15% (30%) accuracy at the 68% (95%) confidence level to determine the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson self-coupling. A future 100 TeV collider could improve the self-coupling measurement to better than 5% (10%) at the 68% (95%) confidence level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available