4.2 Article

Old and afraid of new communication technologies? Reconceptualising and contesting the age-based digital divide'

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 236-248

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1440783318766119

Keywords

digital divide; non-use; older adults; technology adoption; technology use

Categories

Funding

  1. GRAND NCE
  2. AGE-WELL NCE Inc.
  3. Australian Research Council [LP120100022]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP120100022] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite sociological attempts to critically address an age-based digital divide, older adults (65+) continue to be portrayed in the academic literature and public discourse as a homogeneous group characterised by technophobia, digital illiteracy, and technology non-use. Additionally, the role of socioeconomic factors and personal contexts in later life are often overlooked in studies on technology adoption and use. For example, older adults who are identified as least likely to use technology (frail, care-dependent, low socioeconomic/educational backgrounds) are typically described as a uniform cluster. Yet, research on digital technology use with this group remains scant - so what can we learn from studying technology adoption among them? This article discusses long-term deployment of new communication technologies with such a group of older adults, shedding light on the dynamics of technology adoption and contexts of use/non-use. It is based on a case study approach and a cross-cultural perspective, using Canadian and Australian mixed-methods research from two projects that included interviews, psychometric scales, and field observations. We present cases from these projects and contest the simplistic notion of an age-based digital divide, by drawing on Strong Structuration Theory to explore the interconnection of agency, structure, and context in the sociotechnical process of technology adoption and use/non-use among older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available