4.8 Article

Scanning optical microscopy for porosity quantification of additively manufactured components

Journal

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 350-358

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.019

Keywords

3D printing; X-ray computed tomography; Porosity; Optical microscopy; Additive manufacturing

Funding

  1. A*STAR Industrial AM Program: Work Package 3 (Electron Beam Melting) [1325504103]
  2. A*STAR AM Centre (AMC) Initiative: Work Package 1 (High Temperature Materials Development for 3D AM) [1426800088]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electron beam melting (EBM) is a representative powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing technology, which is suitable for producing near-net-shape metallic components with complex geometries and near-full densities. However, various types of pores are usually present in the additively manufactured components. These pores may affect mechanical properties, particularly the fatigue properties. Therefore, inspection of size, quantity and distribution of pores is critical for the process control and assessment of additively manufactured components. Here, we propose a method to quantify the pore size distribution and porosity of additively manufactured components by utilizing scanning optical microscopy. The advantages and limitations of the developed method are discussed based on the comparison study between Archimedes method, conventional optical microscopy and x-ray computed tomography. It is revealed that the new method exhibits the advantages of high precision (similar to 1.75 mu m), more information, high repeatability and low time consumption (20 min/per sample). This provides a new metrology for measurement of not only pores but also micro-cracks, which are the common defects in additively manufactured components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available