4.8 Article

Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for Additive Manufacturing

Journal

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages 81-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008

Keywords

Lattice structures; Functional grading; Topology optimisation; Design for additive manufacturing; Finite element analysis

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N010280/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/N010280/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N010280/1, 1507476] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of strategies that enable lattice structures to be derived from Topology Optimisation (TO) results suitable for Additive Manufacturing (AM) are presented. The proposed strategies are evaluated for mechanical performance and assessed for AM specific design related manufacturing considerations. From a manufacturing stand-point, support structure requirement decreases with increased extent of latticing, whereas the design-to-manufacture discrepancies and the processing efforts, both in terms of memory requirements and time, increase. Results from Finite Element (FE) analysis for the two loading scenarios considered: intended loading, and variability in loading, provide insight into the solution optimality and robustness of the design strategies. Lattice strategies that capitalised on TO results were found to be considerably (-40-50%) superior in terms of specific stiffness when compared to the structures where this was not the case. The Graded strategy was found to be the most desirable from both the design and manufacturing perspective. The presented pros-and-cons for the various proposed design strategies aim to provide insight into their suitability in meeting the challenges faced by the AM design community. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available