4.7 Article

Can urbanization process and carbon emission abatement be harmonious? New evidence from China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 70-83

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.04.005

Keywords

Urbanization; Carbon emissions; Threshold effect; Mediating effect model; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71373153, 71773075]
  2. Shanghai Soft Science Research Program [18692105600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the largest carbon emitter and developing country in the world, China's rapid urbanization in recent decades plays a significant role in carbon emissions. However, there is still no consensus on whether urbanization process and carbon emission abatement in China can achieve a harmonious state. Based on the panel data of China's 30 provincial-level regions during 2001-2014, this paper uses the threshold regression model and the mediating effect model to investigate the effect and its mechanism of urbanization process on carbon emissions measured by three indicators: carbon emission scale, per capita carbon emissions, and carbon intensity. The results show that urbanization can contribute to declines in carbon emission scale, per capita carbon emissions, and carbon intensity. That is to say, urbanization can present an abatement effect on carbon emissions. However, such an abatement effect is diminishing with a deepening urbanization. Moreover, the relationship between urbanization and carbon emissions is mediated by four mediating variables, i.e., technological progress, industrial structure, energy consumption structure, and foreign direct investment. Therefore, a harmonious relationship between urbanization and carbon emission abatement can be achieved if policy-makers attempt to arouse the positive mediation roles of such factors when formulating relevant policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available