4.1 Article

Intra-system reliability of SICS: video-tracking system (Digital.Stadium®) for performance analysis in soccer

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 831-836

Publisher

EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA
DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07267-X

Keywords

Soccer; Systems analysis; Time and motion studies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The correct evaluation of external load parameters is a key factor in professional soccer. The instrumentations usually utilised to quantify the external load parameters during official matches are video-tracking systems (VTS). VTS is a technology that records two-dimensional position data (x and y) at high sampling rates (over 25 Hz). The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-system reliability of Digital.Stadium (R) VTS. METHODS: Twenty-eight professional male soccer players taking part in the Italian Serie A (age 24 +/- 6 years, body mass 79.5 +/- 7.8 kg, stature 1.83 +/- 0.05 m) during the 2015/16 season were enrolled in this study (team A and team B). Video-analysis was done during an official match and data analysis was performed immediately after the game ended and then replicated a week later. RESULTS: This study reported a near perfect relationship between the initial analysis (analysis 1) and the replicated analysis undertaken a week later (analysis 2). R-2 coefficients were highly significant for each of the performance parameters, P<0.001. This study reported a mean TD=8095 +/- 3271 and 8073 +/- 3263 m in analysis 1 and analysis 2, respectively. Players reported a mean distance covered over 25 w kg(-1) equivalent to 1304 +/- 673 m and 1294 +/- 672 m, and they reported a mean metabolic power of 9.65 +/- 1.64 w kg(-1) and 9.58 +/- 1.61 w kg(-1), in analysis 1 and analysis 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reported in this study underlined that all data reported by Digital.Stadium (R) VTS showed high levels of absolute and relative reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available