4.4 Article

Identifying ICT-Related Affective Events Across Life Domains and Examining their Unique Relationships with Employee Recovery

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 529-544

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-017-9508-7

Keywords

Information and communication technology (ICT); Affective events; Recovery; Life domains

Funding

  1. Social Link Project within the Loewe Program of Excellence in Research, Hessen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of information and communication technology (ICT) use for employees by exploring affective ICT events and their relation to employee recovery. We conducted two daily diary studies with knowledge workers in Germany. In study 1 (N = 153), we followed a qualitative approach by developing a taxonomy of negative and positive ICT events at work and at home. We found 11 negative (e.g., multichannel use, work e-mails in the evening) and 10 positive ICT event clusters (e.g., utilizing idle times, availability at home). In study 2 (N = 154), we examined how the occurrence of ICT-related events in the evening is related to detachment from work and sleep quality using a multilevel design. Study 2 provided a differentiated picture of relationships between evening ICT events and recovery. Overall, results indicate that work-related ICT events in the evening-even in cases where they are appraised as positive-are detrimental for employee recovery. Our study contributes to the refinement of the operationalization of ICT use for future analyses of ICT impacts and sheds light on the differential effects of specific types of ICT events. ICT use conceptualized as the occurrence of affective events helps to advance our understanding of the diversity of ICT-related experiences. The negative effects of handling work e-mails at home imply that organizations should engage in optimizing their e-mail culture..

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available